blog

paving the road for the future of technology

2018 Mar 27, by opal hart (PGP signature)

when computing first became a real thing, they were mainly geared toward big business, education, government, and science. networks were groups of trusted entities, there was less need for security or future-proofing, because nobody had anticipated that this technology would become for personal use in the future. early computing and programming pioneers were passionate about their work; software and hardware were built durably because it was still only a niche market, and everyone in the market cared deeply about quality.

now, the tide has shifted and with the advent of personal computers and mobile/IoT technologies, both sides of the equation have weakened: the target market has adopted a consumer approach to technology, and the developers have followed suit. there is no push for developers to cater to quality; there is high demand for cheap labour in these fields. small businesses remain insecure, large businesses can get away with opaque policies and planned obsolescence, and decent software and ideas become overlooked for a few reasons: the creators of good software normally work under the mantra of FOSS, they normally work as a hobby in their own free time, and they do not attract much of a following for one big reason: choice.

give a user a choice between security and ease of use: they'll choose ease of use. give them elegant code or elegant UI, they'll choose UI. it is therefore the developer's responsibility to give users the easy UI/UX they desire as well as the security and elegance they need. some big players like Google understand the value of security (others such as Equifax, maybe not so much, sadly) but they still cut corners with regard to privacy and quality in an effort to take the easy route. because the fact still stands, users have a mentality that anything bad won't happen to me or I have no information that anyone cares to utilise, therefore I must be safe -- they will not do any more than is required to access their services and move on with their life. because of this, it is the developer's responsibility to set a precedence and to give users only one choice.

I believe that all big businesses can invest enough to improve hardware and software quality; to improve security practices; to approach newer, saner standards that match the growing demands of the twenty-first century. it is a shame that thousand-dollar smartphones are not physically worth a thousand dollars, aside from the brand esteem these products have developed. it is sad that phones are not able to last as long as most cars or computers, or to last half as long as houses; they are seen as disposable technologies that are not built to last. it is sad that people cut corners for safety even though basic security practices are easy and cheap to implement these days; and more-advanced security would cost a short-term investment but set a future-proof standard for this type of thing.

a lot of things could be implemented today that would be a bit of a speed bump for companies, but it would be a net improvement both for security and for ease of use. some things I want to see implemented:

it's a shame that not everyone is passionate about technology and that most people just want things to work without exploring them, but that's a fact of life. what we don't need is for this attitude to leak into developers' attitudes. security and quality can be easy, maybe with some additional short-term costs, but it's for the better.

Tags: